Which action would contribute to advocacy against coercion?

Supporting funding for peer support is a significant action that contributes to advocacy against coercion because it promotes the empowerment of individuals in recovery. Peer support enables people to share experiences with those who understand their challenges, fostering a sense of community and belonging. This type of support is built on mutual understanding and respect, rather than coercion, as it encourages individuals to take control of their recovery journey in a non-judgmental environment. When funding for peer support services is advocated and secured, it enhances the resources available to individuals, ensuring they have access to options that empower them rather than imposing decisions upon them.

In contrast, while supporting family involvement or maintaining confidentiality can have merits in certain contexts, they do not directly target coercion as a specific issue. Family involvement might not always be welcome or beneficial for every individual in recovery; hence, it may not inherently reduce coercion. Maintaining confidentiality is crucial for building trust, but if individual needs are not respected or prioritized, coercive situations can still arise. Substituting group therapy for individual sessions may not effectively mitigate coercion since it can lead to experiences where individuals feel pressure to conform to group norms instead of expressing their own needs and desires. Therefore, supporting funding for peer support stands out as the most direct